As director of the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), Dr. Marks was responsible for verifying the safety and efficacy of new biological products before their release to the public. This, of course, included the COVID-19 injections. Yet, instead of recognizing and acknowledging the grave injuries suffered by the brave Americans who were early participants in the clinical trials for the warp-speed COVID-19 "vaccines," Marks blatantly shunned them—even after these calamities were repeatedly brought to his attention. In other words, Marks (who named the mission "warp speed" after his love of Star Trek) chose to overlook 150,000 deaths and the devastating personal injury stories of innocent victims whose lives were forever altered after receipt of the COVID-19 jabs in order to expedite its release to the public—to indeed impose further death and harm—under the FDA's guidance.
Following persistent Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and legal work thanks to The Highwire and ICAN, the truth is finally coming to light, with never-before-seen internal FDA records and over six private phone calls that were recorded between Brianne Dressen, who was injured during the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine trial, and Dr. Marks. The phone calls include individuals in the COVID-19 vaccine trials as they shared the details of their devastating, life-changing injuries.
Remember, while highly rushed and under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), when the FDA stated it was safe to push the COVID jabs on the general public—despite pushback from its own Dr. Marion Gruber, who later resigned—the agency assured the American people there would be a robust system in place to immediately catch problems as they arose. Yet, when injuries multiplied and pressure mounted to examine the trial data the FDA wanted 55 years to share that data. The very same data it relied upon in licensing Pfizer's "safe and effective" COVID-19 jab. That in itself makes no sense and amplifies the debauchery behind the timeline of events under Marks' watch.
One early example of his indifference occurred on September 1, 2021, when Dr. Peter Marks revealed his true colors in response to an extremely concerning email from Steve Kirsch, who shared a comment he made to the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). After previously emailing Janet Woodcock of the FDA regarding Maddie de Garay, a 12-year-old girl who was in the Pfizer trial and is now permanently disabled—yet Pfizer failed to report her injuries in their trial results—Kirsch shared with Marks a detailed commentary he had made to the ACIP communicating the damning findings of a team of over 19 doctors and expert scientists whose analysis showed that "it is highly likely that over 150,000 previously healthy Americans have been killed by the COVID vaccines in 2021."
Moreover, Kirsch and the experts—who offered $1 million to anyone who could prove the mRNA COVID jabs did not kill more people than it saved—also conveyed that they estimated at the time that approximately 574 kids had been killed by the COVID shot. Five hundred and seventy-four children killed! That astounding figure was more than had died from COVID and deserved the attention of the leaders at the FDA to investigate. But instead of digging deeper into the 271 pages of critical work presented by Kirsch and the nearly 20 doctors and scientists highlighting the horrifying real-life examples of the wrath of destruction caused by the mRNA COVID jabs, Marks was easily satisfied with the response from Donna Boyce, Senior Vice President of Global Regulatory Affairs at Pfizer, who outlined, "this case is not related to the vaccine."
Interestingly, Boyce also sits on the Scientific Advisory Council (SAC) at the Center for Innovation Regulatory Science (CIRS), a subsidiary of the Gates-funded "global transformative intelligence leader," Clarivate. Inevitably, a connection to Bill Gates exists whenever and wherever vaccines are blindly pushed. Indeed, instead of examining the report from Kirsch and the other experts and analyzing it within their team, the ACIP labeled the research "standard anti-vaccine." Unbelievably, when Dr. Marks responded internally after Kirsch shared his ACIP comment, he emailed CBER's Deputy Director of Communication, Outreach, and Development, Lorrie McNeill, flatly stating, "We may need to object to this." True colors, indeed.
Make no mistake, the theme of heinous disregard for severe injury following injection of the experimental COVID-19 shots—and the immediate censorship of any alternative treatment for the virus—persisted throughout the timeline of Dr. Peter Marks' tenure at the FDA. Undoubtedly, the evidence uncovered illustrates a disturbing pattern of misleading public statements, gaslighting of vaccine-injured Americans, contradictory statements from Dr. Peter Marks, and, significantly, a clear failure of accountability.
Looking back upon the nightmare that none of us ever want to live again, Marks' deception gained momentum with the FDA's approval—without transparency—of its first COVID-19 vaccine on August 23, 2021. Previously known as the Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19, the FDA-approved vaccine was marketed as Comirnaty, and, as declared by Acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock, its intended use was "for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older." Marks—who missed a meeting with Bri Dressen on that very same day to discuss her vaccine injury—reiterated Woodcock's sentiment, assuring the public that Pfizer's Comirnaty had been thoroughly evaluated and met the FDA's high gold standards, recognized globally, for safety and effectiveness.
Following this declaration, Marks (who had just sworn to the Black Coalition Against COVID-19 that the vaccines were "safe, pure, and potent") emailed Dressen to apologize for missing their call and, instead of offering to support her, he guided her to the NIH. Undoubtedly distraught by the circumstances and clearly more concerned about those injured by the COVID vaccines than was Marks, Dressen replied to Marks, explaining:
"I am unsure I am understanding your message correctly. Just so I have a better understanding, before I go to the NIH, would you mind giving me a call?
We have gone above and beyond to provide insight where the safety signals may be failing to show this this reaction. We are looking for some sort of literal lifeline…that lifeline really should not be people being quietly ushered into the NIH for help months into their suffering. The NIH has also told me and others that they are not taking in any more cases. There are way too many of us, and only a small team there.
Unless there is some arrangement or setup that the agencies are working on that I am unaware of…we are totally on our own.
But more importantly, those who are in the acute phase should be met with appropriate medical care locally, when early intervention has been indicated as key.
I am perplexed by the example of an extremely rare adverse event being recognized by 6 cases (3 fatal), as we met with your team as 6 cases with serious adverse reactions representing thousands, including fatalities (I myself have over 5000 Americans in my group, there is one other with another 3000..just in my small sphere).
Obviously, my energy is extremely limited, and I have no idea how to navigate this complicated system. I cannot stress to you how dire the situation is for these people. There is a reason for these emails: we are not being helped. I keep trying to tell myself there are good people who will be willing to examine this, who will believe that our lives matter. However, as time goes by, I am repeatedly met with the dark reality that awaits those like us, who are being failed by a system that was designed specifically for those of us who experience AEs. Instead of a safety net, we are met with a big gaping hole. When can we discuss?"
We have gone above and beyond to provide insight where the safety signals may be failing to show this this reaction. We are looking for some sort of literal lifeline…that lifeline really should not be people being quietly ushered into the NIH for help months into their suffering. The NIH has also told me and others that they are not taking in any more cases. There are way too many of us, and only a small team there.
Unless there is some arrangement or setup that the agencies are working on that I am unaware of…we are totally on our own.
But more importantly, those who are in the acute phase should be met with appropriate medical care locally, when early intervention has been indicated as key.
I am perplexed by the example of an extremely rare adverse event being recognized by 6 cases (3 fatal), as we met with your team as 6 cases with serious adverse reactions representing thousands, including fatalities (I myself have over 5000 Americans in my group, there is one other with another 3000..just in my small sphere).
Obviously, my energy is extremely limited, and I have no idea how to navigate this complicated system. I cannot stress to you how dire the situation is for these people. There is a reason for these emails: we are not being helped. I keep trying to tell myself there are good people who will be willing to examine this, who will believe that our lives matter. However, as time goes by, I am repeatedly met with the dark reality that awaits those like us, who are being failed by a system that was designed specifically for those of us who experience AEs. Instead of a safety net, we are met with a big gaping hole. When can we discuss?"
Marks' denial of Dressen's vaccine injuries and the over 5,000 vaccine injured in her group alone—including three deaths—is criminal, and an obvious example of what happens when priorities are aligned with Big Pharma. Incredibly, following Dressen's email outlining horrific adverse events following the COVID jab, Marks keeps the ruse going, telling an NFL Alumni town hall meeting that the vaccines might cause "very mild" myocarditis that could be relieved with ibuprofen. Nonetheless, he fiercely defended the mRNA vaccines, wisecracking that "there is incredible BS out there about thousands of people dying, etc. That just ain't [sic] true ... It's very hard to find cases of deaths that are directly related to these vaccines."
And whether speaking about the safety of the vaccines for children or adults, Marks repeatedly continued to deny any harm from the vaccines, despite being made aware by many concerned Americans, including Dr. Danice Hertz—herself injured by the COVID-19 jab (which top experts warned was creating variants). Dr. Hertz notified Marks of tens of thousands of severe adverse events in VAERS, including 8,000 deaths, which, in VAERS, represent just a tiny fraction of the actual numbers. Despite this compulsory information, Mark forged ahead, insisting that "all of the vaccines have been judged to have a benefit that greatly outweighs any risk." Choosing to bypass pleas from physicians that vaccine-injured teens were contemplating suicide, Marks insisted that the jabs had "a remarkably good safety profile ... Despite the rare serious adverse events that have been seen, overall these vaccines are safe and effective."
As time progressed, despite Siri and Glimstead's warnings of adverse events in children, in January 2022, Marks gleefully expanded the FDA's Pfizer EUA booster to include young people 12 to 15 years of age. At this point, with neurological damage following the COVID-19 vaccines in at least 850 cases shared with Marks, the story is now one of sheer insanity. While frantic doctors reported on children with myopericarditis post-COVID-19 vaccine, the FDA authorized the fourth dose (second booster) of either Pfizer or Moderna for Americans 50 and older and immunocompromised people ages 12 and older. Shortly thereafter, the FDA expanded the Pfizer booster to include children five to eleven years old—a move that ICAN urged Marks to revoke. Instead, the FDA extended the EUA for mRNA COVID-19 jabs to include infants just 180 days old.
Along with that—in true warp-speed fashion—the FDA literally went all in. The agency greenlighted future vaccine approvals without human clinical trials, expanded the approval of Pfizer's jab to 12 to 15-year-olds and authorized COVID-19 boosters from Pfizer and Moderna with no human trials. Then, in a genuine twilight-zone crusade, Marks assured that a "great deal of care had been taken" by the FDA to ensure the boosters were safe, urging everyone not to delay in getting the new booster, all while, again, rapidly expanding EAUs to include children as young as six months old. More of the same, sheer insanity and blatantly recklessness.
While it is impossible to cover the entire vast timeline in one article, Marks repeated and relentless approval and promotion of never-before-injected gene-damaging mRNA products—while he remained silent regarding several years' worth of detailed cases confirming thousands upon thousands of severe adverse events and death—was a terrifying voyage that, thank God, has finally come to an end. Knowing Peter Marks's love for Star Trek, one can't help but perhaps compare his seemingly sinister actions related to the experimental COVID jabs to that of Star Trek villain Khan Noonien Singh, who has been described as "humanity's hope for itself gone wrong and evil." Peter Marks resigned from his position at the FDA on April 5, 2025. As vaccine safety takes center stage for the first time in decades, his resignation offers hope for actual truth and transparency.
And whether speaking about the safety of the vaccines for children or adults, Marks repeatedly continued to deny any harm from the vaccines, despite being made aware by many concerned Americans, including Dr. Danice Hertz—herself injured by the COVID-19 jab (which top experts warned was creating variants). Dr. Hertz notified Marks of tens of thousands of severe adverse events in VAERS, including 8,000 deaths, which, in VAERS, represent just a tiny fraction of the actual numbers. Despite this compulsory information, Mark forged ahead, insisting that "all of the vaccines have been judged to have a benefit that greatly outweighs any risk." Choosing to bypass pleas from physicians that vaccine-injured teens were contemplating suicide, Marks insisted that the jabs had "a remarkably good safety profile ... Despite the rare serious adverse events that have been seen, overall these vaccines are safe and effective."
As time progressed, despite Siri and Glimstead's warnings of adverse events in children, in January 2022, Marks gleefully expanded the FDA's Pfizer EUA booster to include young people 12 to 15 years of age. At this point, with neurological damage following the COVID-19 vaccines in at least 850 cases shared with Marks, the story is now one of sheer insanity. While frantic doctors reported on children with myopericarditis post-COVID-19 vaccine, the FDA authorized the fourth dose (second booster) of either Pfizer or Moderna for Americans 50 and older and immunocompromised people ages 12 and older. Shortly thereafter, the FDA expanded the Pfizer booster to include children five to eleven years old—a move that ICAN urged Marks to revoke. Instead, the FDA extended the EUA for mRNA COVID-19 jabs to include infants just 180 days old.
Along with that—in true warp-speed fashion—the FDA literally went all in. The agency greenlighted future vaccine approvals without human clinical trials, expanded the approval of Pfizer's jab to 12 to 15-year-olds and authorized COVID-19 boosters from Pfizer and Moderna with no human trials. Then, in a genuine twilight-zone crusade, Marks assured that a "great deal of care had been taken" by the FDA to ensure the boosters were safe, urging everyone not to delay in getting the new booster, all while, again, rapidly expanding EAUs to include children as young as six months old. More of the same, sheer insanity and blatantly recklessness.
While it is impossible to cover the entire vast timeline in one article, Marks repeated and relentless approval and promotion of never-before-injected gene-damaging mRNA products—while he remained silent regarding several years' worth of detailed cases confirming thousands upon thousands of severe adverse events and death—was a terrifying voyage that, thank God, has finally come to an end. Knowing Peter Marks's love for Star Trek, one can't help but perhaps compare his seemingly sinister actions related to the experimental COVID jabs to that of Star Trek villain Khan Noonien Singh, who has been described as "humanity's hope for itself gone wrong and evil." Peter Marks resigned from his position at the FDA on April 5, 2025. As vaccine safety takes center stage for the first time in decades, his resignation offers hope for actual truth and transparency.
