A serious review of this case, this decision, and its implications is in order.
040-Memorandum Order and Opinion
Since the COVID products were placed under EUA, the government has told us they were "safe and effective." When some doctors and members of the public began to suspect that may not be the case, they turned to VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. The VAERS data was wildly concerning, to say the least, and it picked up a safety signal almost immediately. When word of that spread, the CDC took to discrediting its own system. It is suggested that VAERS, a voluntary reporting system, captures only 1% of adverse events generally occurring.
The website OpenVAERS.com was created to make it easier to track the adverse events being voluntarily reported, given that the government was not transparent about what was occurring. As of 11/3/23, this is a snapshot. I suggest everyone take a look at this for themselves.
It is important to note that many doctors will not even report to VAERS for fear of retribution and because they just want to cover this up. Project Veritas did an expose on that very thing. It is also very time-consuming.
But when the signal from VAERS couldn't be ignored anymore, the CDC lied about how the system worked during a hearing in front of Congress. Then CDC director Rachel Walensky stated when asked that even car accident deaths are captured in VAERS, a BLATANTLY false projection. See for yourself.
The video above was captured 2 years ago. However, another system was implemented to make it appear that the government was monitoring for adverse effects after the COVID-19 shot. Enter V-safe.
As per the CDC, this is the "premier" system for tracking the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. It is an app people can download that allows people who got the shot to tell the CDC about any side effects they experience. But, there are some problems.
However, the app has some limitations. Users are instructed to check boxes as they relate to symptoms. But even the CDC says those "symptoms" just mean the shot is working. So, by that logic, it couldn't ever pick up a safety signal. Approximately 10 million users downloaded and used V-safe. Here is an example of the pre-determined events they could choose.
However, there was another way to track the safety of these novel shots—the free text field. There were a few places where you could write in how you felt or other information, with a character limit. The CDC called this "health impact data"
Also, note that "check box" data was only collected for the first week after vaccination... They then used a week's worth of this data, which they had already said would be typical and show the shot was working, to determine safety for the entire world. Sounds legit. So, the Freedom Coalition of Doctors for Choice, a not-for-profit, sent a FOIA request to the CDC for the data contained within the free text field. Obviously, the CDC said it wouldn't produce and that it would be too cumbersome to filter out privacy information.
Freedom Coalition of Doctors for Choice v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2:23-cv-00102 – CourtListener.com
Here is an example from the BRILLIANT attorney Aaron Siri of what is found in the free text field of this app.
So, the Freedom Coalition of Doctors for Choice SUED the CDC, arguing that the data held within these text fields is imperative to accurately gauge the true safety of these injections. The lawsuit argued that the people using this app were pro-vaccine and early adopters eager to get it. There isn't a bias in this data towards folks who didn't want the shot. We must have this data, and the CDC should be willing to give it to us— after all, the shot is completely and totally safe, right?
If we don't have "real" evidence of harm, no studies will be funded to help those harmed. If we don't have an admission, there is a problem; there will be no accountability for anyone who caused the massive (what I would argue) humanity-altering PROBLEM.
This past week the judge in the case made his ruling. I am going to show you some excerpts of it, because it is TRULY a massive win for transparency and accountability, and we FINALLY may be starting to see the tide turn. Here is the link:
"In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the United States government spearheaded one of the greatest medical endeavors in history. Within months, Congress allocated billions of dollars to fund, develop, manufacture, and distribute hundreds of millions of doses of COVID-19 vaccines. When the first vaccines became available in December of 2020, Defendants launched a massive safety monitoring program called “V-safe.” Because of the rapid and extensive rollout of the vaccine, Defendants used V-safe to quickly collect critical health data for symptoms, adverse events, hospitalization or treatment, and safety issues directly from those who received the vaccines."
The PREP Act declarations provided liability immunity for big pharma....and Warp Speed removed the regulatory requirements you usually need to be able to bring a novel technology to market.
The judge remarks here about the MASSIVE role the federal government had in "promoting" the shot, mentioning the rules, regulations, and policies it implemented - including forced vaccination for employment, referencing OSHA. This has been a terrible tragedy.
The judge states that by early 2023, more than 5.5 BILLION people had received a dose of the vaccine, including more than 270 million Americans... SEVENTY TWO PERCENT OF THE WORLD POPULATION has taken this shot. 72%.
The judge details how V-safe protects user confidentiality—a massive part of the CDC's reluctance to share information. The check box data was also the subject of a lawsuit that was won, thanks to ICAN
Here, the judge explains how this data is being handled and makes a comparison between this data and VAERS. VAERS data is freely available to the public. This data is not.
The judge accurately notes that "Trust the Science" isn't something most Americans are doing right now.
The judge now remarks that this is originally what the system was built for - note how he says "at least initially." The CDC had always maintained that this data would be released and/or made available for FOIA. He states here that while the CDC may have some burden to release this information, the burden isn't unreasonable.
This footnote is awesome. The judge notes that the public may have even more questions in 2024, given Dr. Francis Collins's statements in 2023. He references this article, among others.
Here, the judge throws the CDC a bone about how much data there is, figures out the math, and tells them it isn't burdensome to produce it.
Again, he smacks down the CDC and their claim that personal information would be a burden. He even states that using their argument, there is still a significant number of records that they concede DO NOT contain PII, and should be produced.
The judge addressed informed consent for minors and how doctors can treat patients who have been injured. We are now crossing the threshold.
Here the judge points out that a number of studies have been published using V-safe that only use the first week of data. The others considered only 2 weeks. V-safe was designed to follow people for a YEAR. If some scientists can use the data to show safety in just the first week or two, then other scientists should be able to use the entire data set.
This is the JUDGE—"Additionally, Plaintiff marshaled evidence that some vaccine studies may be misleading or based upon cherry-picked data. One study reported that 0.8% to 1.1% of users reported needing medical care according to the check box data. However, when the raw data was released pursuant to separate FOIA litigation, it showed some 7,7% of V-safe users reported needing medical care and an additional 25% missing school or work or unable to perform normal activities." Think about the scope of that LIE.
And so the judge ruled that the CDC MUST PRODUCE. Here is the minimum production schedule.
The release of this data is crucial for a number of reasons:
1. We will be able to accurately gauge the harms this shot caused, what the CDC/FDA/Government knew, and when they knew it. That will allow us to hold people accountable for what they have done.
2. We will be able to make the case to fund studies to help the many vaccine-injured. We can not bring those who have passed away back, but we can help those still here.
3. We can use this data to stop the roll-out of mRNA/novel technology for other illnesses. We can finally get one foot forward and save humanity from this poison.
4. We can give proper informed consent—parents are making decisions on whether or not to vaccinate their children so that they can go to school. Many districts follow CDC guidelines for required vaccinations.
Many, many more reasons, but please stay with me.
The last few statements I made seem as though I already know what will be contained in the V-safe text fields. After YEARS of reporting on this, I can say with certainty that it isn't going to be: "This is the best thing I have ever done. I feel amazing!!"
Speaking for myself, this is my most important issue right now. As the judge says, it affects more than 70% of the world's population. Whenever anyone tells me we should move on from this, especially because it suits them politically, I resolve to fight longer, harder, and more forcefully for transparency and accountability.
There are so many amazing people working to get information out, doctors trying to figure out the science, injured volunteering for privately funded observation and study - and we are just *now* starting to see some of the long-term effects of this shot.
I will be analyzing the data as it is released. I will be reporting on the data as it is released. I will be fighting for the victims of this horrible human tragedy until the day I take my last breath. Bet on it.
