Missouri v. Biden: The plaintiffs filed a motion asking the judge to allow them to file third-party subpoenas prior to a rule 26(f) conference. That conference is where the parties meet to set out a clear plan for discovery. The hope? That they can retrieve emails sent between parties about important issues that the government wanted censored. These issues are crucial to the case, and as the Oversight Committee was able to uncover, certain key players purposefully used private emails to avoid FOIA. Please find the details below.
They don’t trust any of the defendants, and why should they? The motion discusses in detail how Fauci and Morens illegally evaded FOIA.
This material was material that should have been provided in the preliminary discovery that has already occurred. They continue to point out the perjury Fauci committed in the deposition.
Side note: Of course, they had asked consent to send these subpoenas, and the defendants wouldn’t allow it,
One time when I will thank a House Oversight Committee.
If I know this judge the way I think I do, this will be granted. And wait until you see what these subpoenas are.
They aren’t holding back. They will be sending a subpoena to retrieve DELETED emails…
And, a subpoena for GOOGLE. Yes, Gmail is on the list.
Additionally, their expectation of privacy is waived regarding their personal emails because they used them to knowingly evade detection and conduct official business.
They remind the judge that they were ALREADY entitled to this information, that Fauci (and goodness knows how much this happens) hid from everyone. How many government officials do YOU think evade FOIA in this way? How many are STUPID ENOUGH to write about it on GOV EMAIL?
Here is what they are looking for:
Yes, they are THIS stupid…
Yes, they are THIS stupid.
Some of the exhibits seem to be filed under seal, but yes, they are THIS stupid…
“I’d better delete everything. They’ll never get it that way…(Unless a 3rd party subpoena is granted to the company that publicly explains their retention policy for deleted emails..)”
Yes, they are screwed. Pardon my French.
And that’s that for this one. We will wait for the judge's response. I am looking forward to the SCOTUS decision in Murthy v. Missouri and for discovery in this case to start in earnest. And I will be covering this every step of the way.